The Evolving Healthcare Landscape of Orthopaedic Mergers & Acquisitions:

Trends, Challenges and Opportunities

By: Jervis Yau, M.D., FAANA

Member, AANA Communications and Technology Committee

 

The landscape of healthcare is undergoing significant transformation, with private practices, particularly in orthopaedics, facing new pressures and challenges. Orthopaedic private practice consolidation has emerged as a major trend in the industry, reshaping how care is delivered, managed and reimbursed.

 

The healthcare industry has experienced a surge in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) over the past decade, with orthopaedic practices playing a central role in this consolidation trend. As independent practices face increasing operational challenges, M&A has emerged as a strategic solution to enhance efficiency, improve patient care and strengthen market positioning.

 

Several factors are fueling the consolidation of orthopaedic private practices. Some of the most prominent include:

  1. Financial Pressures: Running an independent orthopaedic practice has become increasingly difficult due to rising operational costs, declining reimbursement rates and the administrative burden of dealing with insurance companies. Many private practices are struggling to maintain profitability in a rapidly changing healthcare environment. Consolidation with larger entities or corporate-backed organizations allows for shared resources, better negotiating power with insurers and increased financial stability.
  2. Regulatory and Compliance Demands: Healthcare regulations, including the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the increasing adoption of value-based care models, have added complexity to practice management. Small practices may lack the resources to stay compliant with changing rules, such as those related to electronic health records (EHRs) or billing codes. Merging with a larger entity allows for the pooling of resources and expertise in navigating these regulatory challenges.
  3. Access to Technology and Advanced Equipment: As medical technology advances, staying on top of the latest innovations becomes more expensive. Consolidation with larger practices or healthcare systems gives Orthopaedic Surgeons access to state-of-the-art diagnostic tools, surgery equipment and integrated electronic health systems, which improve patient outcomes and operational efficiency.
  4. Focus on Patient-Centered Care: As patient expectations evolve and the focus shifts toward more personalized, patient-centered care, orthopaedic practices must adapt. Consolidation offers practices the opportunity to offer a broader range of services, expand care options and engage in multidisciplinary approaches that would be difficult for small practices to manage alone.
  5. Economies of Scale: One of the key benefits of consolidation is the ability to capitalize on economies of scale. Larger organizations can spread fixed costs (such as administrative overhead, legal fees and marketing expenses) across multiple locations and practitioners, which can lead to better financial outcomes and a higher quality of care.

 

As a result of these factors, private practices across the U.S. have seen increased M&A activity. Some consolidation trends worth noting are the rise of private equity investments, shifts toward value-based care, increased hospital and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) acquisitions and formation of regional supergroups.

 

Private equity (PE) firms have increasingly targeted orthopaedic practices, drawn by their high-revenue potential, outpatient surgical capabilities and growth opportunities. PE-backed consolidations allow practices to benefit from centralized management, enhanced negotiation power with insurers and streamlined operations. Companies like U.S. Orthopaedic Partners and OrthoAlliance have spearheaded this trend, expanding their networks across multiple states.

 

The transition from fee-for-service to value-based care models has significantly influenced M&A activity. There are companies that focus on bundled payment models for joint replacements and spine surgeries, among others. These companies negotiate payments for specific surgeries between payors and providers with the aim to provide patients with optimum care while reducing the total episode of care for payors. Larger orthopaedic practices and health systems are typically more attractive to these companies because it enables better care coordination, access and cost control measures.

 

Hospitals and health systems are actively acquiring orthopaedic practices and their affiliated ASCs to integrate specialized care into their service lines. Orthopaedic practices and its associated ancillary services provide an attractive revenue source for health systems given their referral potential for healthcare services. Furthermore, as orthopaedic procedures continue to shift towards ASCs, it allows health systems to benefit from their procedural efficiencies, lower cost and higher profitability.

 

Another trend within orthopaedic consolidation focuses on physician-owned supergroups. Rather than selling to external investors, some independent practices are merging with regional peers to form large, orthopaedic supergroups or multi-specialty organizations. This model enables practices to maintain clinical autonomy while achieving economies of scale in administration, technology adoption, payer negotiations and expense management.

 

There are, however, important challenges to consider within orthopaedic M&A. Some include:

  1. Loss of Autonomy: One of the biggest drawbacks for Orthopaedic Surgeons involved in consolidation is the potential loss of autonomy. Independent decision-making may become more difficult, as corporate structures or hospital networks impose policies and guidelines that may not align with the individual goals of the practice or surgeon.
  2. Cultural Shifts: Orthopaedic Surgeons accustomed to running their own practices may struggle with the cultural shift when joining larger healthcare organizations. The transition can lead to disagreements on management and governance style, clinical decision-making and philosophy, creating tension between physicians and administrators.
  3. Technology and Data Integration: Combining multiple EHR systems and IT infrastructures can pose significant challenges. Seamless data integration is critical for ensuring continuity of care and operational efficiency post-merger.
  4. Quality of Care Concerns: There is ongoing debate about whether larger, consolidated organizations can maintain the same level of personalized care that smaller, independent practices offer. The focus on volume and efficiency may sometimes lead to concerns about the quality of patient care and the ability to maintain a close physician-patient relationship.
  5. Financial Implications: Although consolidation can provide financial stability, the initial costs of merging, including legal fees, severance packages and integration expenses, can be significant. These financial burdens may deter some practices from pursuing consolidation, particularly if the long-term benefits do not outweigh the immediate costs.
  6. Reimbursement and Payer Negotiations: As practices consolidate, they must renegotiate contracts with private insurers and government payers. Navigating reimbursement structures while maintaining profitability can be complex, particularly in markets with heavy Medicare and Medicaid reliance.

Orthopaedic surgery practice consolidation is a significant trend reshaping healthcare. The orthopaedic M&A landscape is rapidly evolving, driven by private equity investments, value-based care initiatives and the growing appeal of outpatient surgery centers for health systems. While challenges such as loss of autonomy, cultural integration, technology and data integration, quality of care, financial implications and reimbursement contracts remain, the opportunities for efficiency, growth and financial stability, market presence and improved value care make M&A a compelling strategy for orthopaedic practices. As healthcare consolidation continues, stakeholders must navigate this dynamic environment with careful planning and strategic foresight to maximize long-term success.

 

References:

  1. Herschman, G., Jacoby, D. Consolidation and Strategic Partnerships for Orthopaedic Groups: Trends for 2025 and Practical Recommendations for Success. Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation. 2025, February. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.60118/​001c.128996.
  2. Henretty, K.N., He, F. Trends in Orthopedic Surgeon Practice Consolidation From 2008 to 2019. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2022 Mar;37(3):409-413. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 13. PMID: 34780926.
  3. Mikhail, C., Shankar, D., Taree, A., Mody, K., Barbera, J., Okewunmi, J., Cho, S., Anthony, S. Trends in Private Equity Acquisition of Orthopaedic Surgery Practices in the United States. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global Research & Reviews. 2021 Dec 20;5(12):e21.00162-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00162. PMID: 34928875; PMCID: PMC8691511.
  4. Jacob, K., Patel, M., Gheewala, J., Prabhu, M., Pawlowski, H., Vanjani, N., Singh, K. Trend Toward Consolidation Within Orthopedic Surgery, and the Role of Private Equity. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global Research & Reviews. 2021 Dec 20;5(12):e21.00162-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00162. PMID: 34928875; PMCID: PMC8691511.
  5. Tewfik, G., Grech, D., Laham, L., Chaudhry, F., Naftalovich, R. The Risks and Benefits of Physician Practice Acquisition and Consolidation: A Narrative Review of Peer-Reviewed Publications Between 2009 and 2022 in the United States. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2024;17:2271-2279. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S463618Bottom of Form
  6. Herschman, G., Jacoby, D., Torres, H. Private Equity Partnerships with Orthopedic Groups:  2022 Trends and Strategic Insights for 2023 Including Insights from Special Feature:  Survey of Orthopedic Surgeons on ‘Life After Closing’ in Private Equity Deals. Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation. 2023. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.60118/​001c.70249.
  7. Moses, M., Weiser, L., Bosco, J. The Corporate Practice of Medicine: Ethical Implications of Orthopaedic Surgery Practice Ownership by Non-Physicians. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 102(11):p e53, June 3, 2020. | DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01404
  8. Rahman, O., Limpisvasti, O., Kharrazi, F., ElAttrache, N. Current Concepts in the Business of Orthopaedics. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 32(5):p e204-e213, March 1, 2024. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00629
  9. Lundy, D. A Day at the Office: Private Practice and Private Equity. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 477(5):p 955-957, May 2019. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000758
Scroll to top